Design vs Testing · both proven

accessibility-compliance vs systematic-debugging

Both skills were run through Claude twice: once on a fixed brief without the skill, once with it. The briefs differ because each is written for the job the skill claims to do, so compare each skill against its own baseline, then decide which difference matters for your work. They are in different categories, so this is a choice of job, not a head-to-head on the same job.

accessibility-compliance

Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.

Category: Design
Source: wshobson/agents · 41,103 stars
License: MIT
Proof model: claude-opus-5-5
Brief: “Build the settings page for a team workspace app with tabs for Profile, Notifications and Privacy, including toggles, a select menu, a danger zone, and save and cancel buttons with success and error states. Make it fully keyboard-navigable and screen-reader friendly, and make it look like a finished product.”
Skill commit: 0874a27

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Category: Testing
Source: obra/superpowers · 301,947 stars
License: MIT
Proof model: claude-opus-5-5
Brief: “A Node.js API returns 500 for about 1 in 200 requests to POST /orders. Logs show 'TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading "id")' at orders.js:48, which reads req.user.id. The route is behind an auth middleware. The failures started after a deploy that added a 30-second cache on the session lookup. Present your diagnosis and fix as a single HTML page: what you checked, in order, the root cause, the code change, and how you would confirm it is fixed.”
Skill commit: bb92a77

We don’t pick a winner for you: the pages are the evidence. Both proofs can be repeated with the brief, model and commit shown above. See alternatives to accessibility-compliance or alternatives to systematic-debugging.